The Complex Dynamics of Religious Conversion or Why Conversion?

         India's modern history begins from the end of Mahabharat and nirvaan of Shri Krishan, more than 5000 years back. India successfully resisted Alexender march into its heartland and attained golden age, during the Gupta Period, spanning from 400 to 660 AD, marking a time of cultural and scientific prosperity. However, the following 1300 years, from 660 to 1947, were marred by foreign invasions and exploitation. This era witnessed the destruction of temples and concerted efforts to erode India's cultural and heritage properties. Despite these challenges, India's deep-rooted spiritual strength, which transcends physicality, ensured its survival. This resilience is reflected in the Indian Constitution, which embodies democratic principles, as evident in the preamble and key articles (14, 19, and 21), along with the Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties.

        Globally, the religious population is divided among various beliefs, with Christianity and Islam being the two largest.

Sl.	Religion	Percent	Population
1	Christianity	31%	2,511,000,000
2	Islam	24.90%	2,016,900,000
3	Unaffiliated	15.60%	1,263,600,000
4	Hinduism + Sikhism	15.50%	1,255,500,000
5	Buddhism	6.60%	534,600,000
6	Folk Religions	5.60%	453,600,000
7	Others	0.80%	64,800,000
	Total	100%	8,100,000,000

 Forceful conversion has been a significant and controversial issue associated with Christianity and Islam since their inception. Christianity, rooted in the teachings of Jesus from the mid-first century, and Islam, established in 622 after Muhammad's migration to Medina, both encompass historical narratives that intertwine with the concept of conversion. Notably, certain factions within these religions, particularly some missionary Christians and followers of Sunni Islam, have historically pursued conversion efforts based on interpretations or misunderstandings of their respective philosophies. These interpretations, often espoused by a minority within these religious groups, tend to inflame passions among their followers. This fervor has sometimes led to conflicts, both within these religious communities and with those outside them.

Such actions often stem from a few individuals or groups within these religions who interpret religious texts and teachings in ways that justify or encourage forceful conversion. This (mis)interpretation of religious doctrine has contributed to a history of inter-religious strife and tension, impacting social and cultural dynamics globally. The fundamental goal for both Christianity and Islam appears to be achieving a majority population status. However, this is a complex and potentially unattainable goal, considering the diverse global religious landscape, where approximately 45% of the population adheres to other faiths or beliefs. The philosophical differences in the concepts of salvation or spiritual liberation among various religions are notable. For instance, in Hinduism, the concept of 'moksha' (liberation) and 'nirvana' in Buddhism emphasizes individual karma and spiritual growth, contrasting with the Christian belief in salvation during the Day of Judgment and Islamic views on 'Qayamat' (Day of Resurrection), both of which will arrive when they are in majority.

Efforts to convert populations have profound impacts:

❤ Alteration of the subcontinent's civilizational character.

❤ Exploitation of ethnic diversity and undermining of the notion of a unified cultural identity.

❤ Promotion of the belief that local cultures are products of invasions or migrations.

❤ Creation of societal conflicts and divisiveness on religious, caste, and economic grounds

❤ Denigration of intellectuals and nationalists.

❤ Economic and cultural impoverishment through various means, including armed conflicts and                terrorism.

❤ Deployment of inducements like free medical services and education for conversions.

❤ Encouragement of drug use and other forms of entertainment as tools for conversion.

❤ Humiliation and degradation of ancient ethnic cultures and spiritual values.

The practice of converting individuals through allurements, threats, or intimidation contradicts the principles of democracy, which is a fundamental aspect of the Indian Constitution. Such practices also violate the spirit and letter of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.